MonkeyFocker, my attempt here was not to say one is better than the other. I attempt was to explain in the most basic of terms what Pavy was saying about the price not playing a factor in his decision making. I attempted to highlight the differences the math the preverbal glass 1/2 empty and capping the preverbal glass 1/2 full.
I don't have a dog in the hunt because I am not now nor will I ever be a professional gambler regardless of how much I kid about it. I am fascinated by the process but I am no where near focused, dedicated or let's be honest, bright enough to fully encompass all that you guys do. I can figure out the volume of a cylinder, the flow rate of a 6" pipe. how many lbs of water in a specific tank and if the cashier gave me back the correct but after that my interest in math then becomes an effort.
Personally for the guys that are really good at this, I doubt if one is really better than another. I mean if it works, if you are making a living doing it, if you have a proven process then what does it matter if someone else thinks it's misguided or flawed?
Now while some people could never or would never fully grasp the math behind the process there are still others that might still learn something or find a portion of something that they can adapt to or incorporate into what they do and vice versa.
Pavy said the line, the price the math basically doesn't play a role in his process because he has knowledge of the teams, the situations, the players so regardless if he is getting the best price or not if his team wins he wins. That's practical to him but it's illogical to the math guys because they are concerned that if their team doesn't win and they didn't get the right best price it hurts them longer term on the bottom line. Neither is wrong if it works for them.
I know this is a very simplistc overview but I am what I am. When I was coaching I would always encourage the kids to be smarter than me but I couldn't teach them to be smarter than me.