thejrichshow
New Member
- Since
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 30
- Score
- 0
- Tokens
- 0
wal66
New Member
- Since
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 11,716
- Score
- 2
- Tokens
- 0
Bread can handle being luv'd.
RJ, is luv'd but he is such a rambler that it never takes.
Archie enjoys ciaos to much to ever allow the luv to settle.
Matty is luv'd so by Fiver that any other luv fades in comparison.
Daft expects to be luv's but he loves himself more than anyone else ever could.
BayBud is cherished but luv'd?
Muddy is luv'd by all but pointing this out probably embarrasses him a wee bit.
Tully is probably luv'd but won't likely remember in the morning.
Plommer scoffs at the mere thought of luv.
RJ, is luv'd but he is such a rambler that it never takes.
Archie enjoys ciaos to much to ever allow the luv to settle.
Matty is luv'd so by Fiver that any other luv fades in comparison.
Daft expects to be luv's but he loves himself more than anyone else ever could.
BayBud is cherished but luv'd?
Muddy is luv'd by all but pointing this out probably embarrasses him a wee bit.
Tully is probably luv'd but won't likely remember in the morning.
Plommer scoffs at the mere thought of luv.
wal66
New Member
- Since
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 11,716
- Score
- 2
- Tokens
- 0
Daft, I don't consider what I do here as CRUSHING Daft. I consider it stating and sometimes overstating the obvious. You have an enormously high opinion of yourself Daffer's which makes for plenty of material.
You did keep in the spirit of the thread though, I do luv poking fun at you.
You did keep in the spirit of the thread though, I do luv poking fun at you.
roguejuror
rouge
- Since
- Jan 24, 2010
- Messages
- 64,062
- Score
- 5,540
- Tokens
- 36
What's a rambler?
wal66
New Member
- Since
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 11,716
- Score
- 2
- Tokens
- 0
It was actually a car once but can be used to suggest a person always on the move, a nomad of sorts who can't be tied down for long.
wal66
New Member
- Since
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 11,716
- Score
- 2
- Tokens
- 0
I know Arch, I'm processing it.
If you had said luv I could have easily accepted and replied even. You said love though and so now I am breaking it down, over-analyzing it and trying to figure out the best way to proceed. I mean I could casually say I love you in return but that would be either (A) an often natural but not always sincere too quick response, (B) a sarcastic, so sarcastic that no-one would ever know when it wasn't sarcastic response, (C) a watered down almost generic response that is neither truthful nor does it even have any value left, it doesn't even carry the weight of saying "good morning" to a stranger in terms of politeness.
If you had said luv I could have easily accepted and replied even. You said love though and so now I am breaking it down, over-analyzing it and trying to figure out the best way to proceed. I mean I could casually say I love you in return but that would be either (A) an often natural but not always sincere too quick response, (B) a sarcastic, so sarcastic that no-one would ever know when it wasn't sarcastic response, (C) a watered down almost generic response that is neither truthful nor does it even have any value left, it doesn't even carry the weight of saying "good morning" to a stranger in terms of politeness.
: