You're holding men to a higher standard than women because men are seen as the ones who are not supposed to "punch back".
So when men are portrayed as bumbling idiots in the media, when they're sent to mandatory college classes on how not to rape, when they're losing the incentive to marry but are shamed for not marrying and when some say they don't want to interact with women because there's no plus side for them, women are crying foul.
I must say this though: women don't have to comply with men at all. Honestly.
Women have been told that they "don't need no man", that they're independent and that they can do anything a man can do but only better.
So by all means, don't bother with men. The issue isn't with those women at all.
It's with the ones who want the benefits without the responsibilities.
It creates expectations that men cannot fulfill, destroys relationships and when men point out they're being given a raw deal, apparently they want to make women the punching bags.
I think the MGTOW movement is an example of men not wanting to take or give any punches.
Which, just like the woman not wanting to interact with men, is fine. Like I said, the issue is not with women who don't want to bother with men.
It's with women who insist men change, that they're wrong for being men, that their masculinity is toxic, that they're criminals and rapists just waiting to happen, that they should be more like women (because women are better) and that they've somehow got it better despite having issues not enough people take seriously enough.
When you give people in general no incentive to try, they won't. So why bother? Right now, things like marriage, sex, reproductive rights and divorce are in women's favour.
Women have more incentives to marry than men, for example. If women want nothing to do with men, they are under no obligation to comply.
But then they shouldn't be telling men they're intrinsically bad/wrong for being men and the laws should not reflect this either.
Women are welcome to start their own companies, live separately from men, build their own homes and make their own money if they do not want to comply.
However, to suggest men offer women nothing when women choose to be with men, especially high quality men?
Well, that's where the argument falls flat. Many men aren't spitting nearly as much hate towards women as women are towards men.
If your argument is that men should be really nice while women get to do what they want, then you're asking too much. If the incentive you're talking about is that men be nicer, then women have to be nicer too. If it means men accepting women as they are, then women have to accept men as they are too.