Who is going to be the next President of the United States?

  • Start date
    • •
  • Replies 1,787 Comments
  • • Views 107,797 Views
Common pal, my panties aren't in a bunch. I use an iron.

"All I said was that I heard claims there was strange jump" yes, and who was behind these silly claims (and all the other nonsense)? Trumptards.
There was/is no impropriety. Trump can't handle losing. Can't say I'm not enjoying watching him meltdown.

Trump thinks that because you have a lead it can't be overcome, JFC. Maybe thats why he wanted to "stop the count"?
Why can't he accept that a majority of Americans prefer the other candidate? Why can't he put his country first and not his ego?
Because hes a shit human being.

Reno, it appears as though I'm not the one with panties in a bunch, sir.
 
FB_IMG_1604686360451.jpg
 
I wanted to have a few cackles at the Twitter tantrum that is brewing or on progress but from what I can tell, Twitter has banned his Twitter page.
 
plommer
Common pal, my panties aren't in a bunch. I use an iron.

"All I said was that I heard claims there was strange jump" yes, and who was behind these silly claims (and all the other nonsense)? Trumptards.
There was/is no impropriety. Trump can't handle losing. Can't say I'm not enjoying watching him meltdown.

Trump thinks that because you have a lead it can't be overcome, JFC. Maybe thats why he wanted to "stop the count"?
Why can't he accept that a majority of Americans prefer the other candidate? Why can't he put his country first and not his ego?
Because hes a shit human being.

Reno, it appears as though I'm not the one with panties in a bunch, sir.
Click to expand...

Well obviously it wouldn't be the Bidentards making these claims :duh: . They still working on legit theories on how Russia stole our democracy through facebook memes
 

Login • Instagram

Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.
www.instagram.com www.instagram.com
 
New law in San Francisco

“Overpaid Executive Tax” in SF hits firms that pay CEOs 100X more than workers.

Businesses can either pay tax, reduce top executive salary, or pay workers more.
 
Much cheaper to pay tax than raise salaries.

The “Overpaid Executive Tax,” formally known as Proposition L, will charge any company that does business in San Francisco and has a top executive earning over 100 times more than their “typical local worker,” according to the tax’s author, Matt Haney, a member of the city's Board of Supervisors.

Companies with top executives who fall into this category must pay a 0.1 percent surcharge on their annual business taxes. The surcharge increases by 0.1 percent per factor of 100, topping out at 0.6 percent. So top earners making 200 times more than the average worker pay a 0.2 percent tax and so on.
Click to expand...

www.aol.com

San Francisco passes 'Overpaid Executive Tax'

It will charge any company that does business in the city and has a top executive earning over 100 times more than their “typical local worker,”
www.aol.com www.aol.com
 
Can Biden successfully convert the USA to a socialist/communist paradise in 4 short years?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.