roguejuror
rouge
- Since
- Jan 24, 2010
- Messages
- 66,804
- Score
- 7,347
- Tokens
- 36
hey dark horse, er, i mean pavy, your latest conspiracy theory would hold more water if the associated press was indeed part of the bcs calculations.
alabama was nothing more than a 'wild card' in the mix this season. we've seen teams that haven't won their divisions win it all on the pro level, why not at the college level? the bcs formula isn't really that complicated. sure, there might be simpler ways to arrive at the same ending, but the bcs has done its job since it started, and that was to put the no. 1 and no. 2 teams against each other in a single bowl game. alabama was certainly a better team than any 2nd-place squad in any other conference, the pac-12 perhaps having the only possible argument to make against that opinion of mine.
the biggest injustice this year was what took place in the sugar and orange bowls. there's not a viable argument to make for the big east having a team in the bcs bowls either of the past two seasons, at least none based on talent and performance on the field, and boise state was a team left out that should've taken the place of one from the trio of west virginia/va tech/michigan.
http://gamelive.com/forum/member.php/52-Dark-Horse