Mudcat
yap
- Since
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 32,603
- Score
- 440
- Tokens
- 0
Muddy, Romania's borders with Ukraine, the eastern one is so chic-y but the northern one is still my favorite. Do you concur?
Obviously.
Muddy, Romania's borders with Ukraine, the eastern one is so chic-y but the northern one is still my favorite. Do you concur?
I have no idea. That's my point. I have never been able to judge. I would have thought Fabio was pretty ugly but look at the life he has had.
My endorsement is worthless.
But I would guess Daft is good looking, yes.![]()

OK, so Muddy what your saying is I was all wrong with breaking Dafty's stones bout constantly looking in the mirror at himself! He has good reason then! He can't help himself! Gotcha ya! 
the guy in your picture has too big/round a face, pale skin and lousy side burns.
Let's talk about how I judge the physical good-lookingness of men.
I can recognize if a man is improperly groomed (bad teeth/hair like half the people where I work) and I can recognize obesity. That stuff looks bad to me. So I drop those men down to the bottom of the attractiveness continuum.
As it turns out, that is a significant percentage of the male population.
Now some of the men still standing will have tattoos and piercings. They are off the island. And there is stuff like rampant zits/blatant deformities/whatnot. Same boat. I find that cigarette smoking looks very ugly so if I see that, same boat.
I am somewhat aware of bad facial hair. That is a subjective thing of course but certain facial hair will catch my attention in a negative way. Off the island.
So what you have left is all the men who are clean/tidy and reasonably fit. They are basically all on the same level to me. I would not say I find them attractive but it is the top level anyway.
From what I have seen, Daft is on that level.
It is very rare for one of those men to stand out to me, good or bad. So to see a guy who is one of top heartthrobs in western society right now and have an actual - man that's an ugly guy - reaction, seemed very random thoughtable.
And that is the story with that. I'm glad we had this talk.
![]()
Let's talk about how I judge the physical good-lookingness of men.
I can recognize if a man is improperly groomed (bad teeth/hair like half the people where I work) and I can recognize obesity. That stuff looks bad to me. So I drop those men down to the bottom of the attractiveness continuum.
As it turns out, that is a significant percentage of the male population.
Now some of the men still standing will have tattoos and piercings. They are off the island. And there is stuff like rampant zits/blatant deformities/whatnot. Same boat. I find that cigarette smoking looks very ugly so if I see that, same boat.
I am somewhat aware of bad facial hair. That is a subjective thing of course but certain facial hair will catch my attention in a negative way. Off the island.
So what you have left is all the men who are clean/tidy and reasonably fit. They are basically all on the same level to me. I would not say I find them attractive but it is the top level anyway.
From what I have seen, Daft is on that level.
It is very rare for one of those men to stand out to me, good or bad. So to see a guy who is one of top heartthrobs in western society right now and have an actual - man that's an ugly guy - reaction, seemed very random thoughtable.
And that is the story with that. I'm glad we had this talk.
![]()
So you're gay for metrosexual types.
I prefer guys that have a bit of ruggedness going before I consider putting my supple lips on their throbbing, yet ever-so-willing cocks.
But this is what makes life unique, eh?
Robert Pattinson sure doesn't have a symmetrical head. He looks like a split level bungalow or something.