Boner_18
Active Member
- Since
- Oct 5, 2010
- Messages
- 8,022
- Score
- 4,209
- Tokens
- 25
Its a plan if you keep it to yourself. My point wasn't about the specific plan or this specific circumstance - it's about communicating your actual plan directly to your competitor and having a tacit agreement about how it "should" play out. How much collusion makes a joint plan vs. a fix? I dunno the answer.That's a plan, not a fix! Are you saying that fighters are supposed to go full throttle from the opening bell just because people put money on the fight?
By that logic, a marathon would be decided in just a few minutes, in an all-out sprint, with the last guy standing getting awarded gold, everyone else puking their guts out around the 1 kilometer mark.
Y'all are not understanding the sport at all. It's about planning and budgeting.
Every bit of information shared between the sides make it come closer to an episode of a "reality" competition (with production controling the outcome) rather than a contest judged blindly.
Would you call it "fixed" if Paul and Joshua promised one another no tko or ko before the 4th because we need to "give the people a show" and thereafter "may the best man win." I would.
Did they collude here? I dunno I guess. Probably? Given that Joshua didnt destroy him (and then did the "i am unhappy with my performance..." schtick) and the knockout was clearly KO-lite i think the answer is pretty obvious.