Hooligans Sportsbook

Epstein's list

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    122 Replies •
  • Views 5,941 Views
Follow
It's definitely true of the past administrations as well. If I had to make a wild guess there's too many high ranking and current members of Congress/CIA/FBI implicated. If they had Trump at Epstein Island they would have used it pre-2024 instead of bringing the nonsensical charges in order to "call him a felon" which totally backfired.

I'm done sticking up for Trump for the time being, but that 34 felonies nonsense was unbelievable. Unfortunately I think you have a president who's going to make sure the score is settled. It's going to be a pretty crazy 2025-2026. Expect fireworks. 11 personal years will do that.

Trump born 6/14
6+1+4 (11)
USA founded 7/4
7+4 (11)

Same cycles separated by a couple weeks.

Oddly enough Trump is also born on the same day the US Army was founded.

I'd say if you thought early 2025 was crazy, wait till you see the next 12 months. I'm not confident it will be smooth sailing.
 
forks america because
 
Newly uncovered metadata reveals that nearly three minutes of footage were cut from what the US Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation described as “full raw” surveillance video from the only functioning camera near Jeffrey Epstein’s prison cell the night before he was found dead. The video was released last week as part of the Trump administration’s commitment to fully investigate Epstein’s 2019 death but instead has raised new questions about how the footage was edited and assembled.

WIRED previously reported that the video had been stitched together in Adobe Premiere Pro from two video files, contradicting the Justice Department’s claim that it was “raw” footage. Now, further analysis shows that one of the source clips was approximately 2 minutes and 53 seconds longer than the segment included in the final video, indicating that footage appears to have been trimmed before release. It’s unclear what, if anything, the minutes cut from the first clip showed.
Click to expand...

the metadata never lies :nono: , whoever edited the released video is not aware of keyframes in video codecs, in a video container like mp4 a video might have 30 frames per second but not all frames are the same, there are guiding frames called keyframes that are a complete full picture frame while the rest of the frames in-between contain only partial information, usually only of the pixels that changed from the previous frame, keyframes are important to be able to seek or randomly jump to any point in the video through a player, depending on the encoding codec used these keyframes come along anywhere from every 3 up to 11 seconds of actual video length usually, while editing if you cut at a point that is not a keyframe the software will have to either re-encode, leaving evidence of the software used to re-encode, or stitch the pieces together without re-encoding but leaving evidence of the original keyframes count through missing timestamps and keyframe indexes, thus being able to come up with the original full length of the video, in other words Bondi is full of shit
 
It's amazing how dumb some people are. Like the person responsible for covering this up googled "how to cut a video" and just followed the top result. A large part of my career success came from understanding what metadata does (and doesn't) say about something. Spent a lot of time educating talented lawyers about this shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.