Hooligans Sportsbook

Breaking Nothing Burgers

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    240 Replies •
  • Views 6,004 Views
Follow
Cougar Bait
I mean, of late the % of trannies doing mass shootings has to be (on avg compared to male/female) through the roof % wise. This is a unique new scenario, so I doubt there's much data on it.

EDIT - According to the Google machine is the same % of people that identify as transgender.

Are we just talking about rapes?
Just kid rapes?

Yeah I doubt it's higher than any other "category"

The reporting part is the important part Davey...that's a key part really.
Click to expand...
How convenient, we can ignore years of data that an incredibly low number has been responsible for mass shootings:

The Gun Violence Archive (GVA) defines a mass shooting as any incident which injured or killed at least four victims, excluding the shooter, and counted 5,748 mass shootings in the US between January 1, 2013, and September 15, 2025. According to GVA founder Mark Bryant, five of these shootings (0.09%) involve a perpetrator confirmed to be transgender,[a] with an additional three (0.05%) involving suspects with an unconfirmed gender identity. By comparison, approximately 1% of the United States population identifies as transgender.

...and just go on "has to be through the roof %wise" feels backed by 🤷‍♂️. New stuff, no data.

And yeah, I've always agreed with you mainstream media is fucking garbage. But so is the bullshit peddling the other side disproportionately, no? Don't we agree all bullshit media is bad?
 
Ah, now I get it. How it's defined.

"U.S. mass shootings" uses a narrow, event-based definition. Incidents that did not occur in public places with fewer than four fatalities (excluding the shooter) were not counted.

I'm not sure the numbers would be that much different really.

It's probably over reported on right wing news and under reported on left wing news.
 
I didn't ignore anything - maybe you didn't read my edit.
Vegas Dave
How convenient, we can ignore years of data that an incredibly low number has been responsible for mass shootings:

The Gun Violence Archive (GVA) defines a mass shooting as any incident which injured or killed at least four victims, excluding the shooter, and counted 5,748 mass shootings in the US between January 1, 2013, and September 15, 2025. According to GVA founder Mark Bryant, five of these shootings (0.09%) involve a perpetrator confirmed to be transgender,[a] with an additional three (0.05%) involving suspects with an unconfirmed gender identity. By comparison, approximately 1% of the United States population identifies as transgender.

...and just go on "has to be through the roof %wise" feels backed by 🤷‍♂️. New stuff, no data.

And yeah, I've always agreed with you mainstream media is fucking garbage. But so is the bullshit peddling the other side disproportionately, no? Don't we agree all bullshit media is bad?
Click to expand...
 
Cougar Bait
Ah, now I get it. How it's defined.

"U.S. mass shootings" uses a narrow, event-based definition. Incidents that did not occur in public places with fewer than four fatalities (excluding the shooter) were not counted.

I'm not sure the numbers would be that much different really.

It's probably over reported on right wing news and under reported on left wing news.
Click to expand...
Agreed for sure.

And that carries over to general opinion as well. Left wingers act like transgender people are ALL innocent (like there aren't monsters and perverts among them, which of course there are) and right wingers act like they are all perverts and rapists (which of course they aren't).

I guess my point would be since they make up a miniscule % of the population, and then a miniscule number of them are problematic, the lefties' bullshit zero is a lot closer to reality than the righties' bullshit "a lot".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.