Hooligans Sportsbook

Who is going to be the next President of the United States?

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    6,119 Replies •
  • Views 391,794 Views
I mean in an other era of time the POTUS pump-and-dump scamming his followers out of this kind of money would be a massive term-ending scandal. But here in 2026 it's not even noteworthy, just 🤷‍♂️.

Something something Nancy Pelosi something something Hunter Biden something something.
 
Not sure

But, as with any investment, the risk lies solely with the risk taker.
You are 100% right. And it's cool you don't give a shit. But I'd argue the President of the United States should serve the people of the United States, not farm them for more personal wealth. Even the ones dumb enough to not see that he's scamming them.
 
We aren't really talking about me though are we? If you want to make it personal that's fine. But don't sit up on high the next time I post a tweet that's not 100% verifiable fact.

If you expect it of me am I not to expect it of you?
I mean what point are you trying to make here?

Do you believe that Trump wasn't involved in this? That the reports that he was involved in the scam are false?

I mean what the fuck even is a "100% verifiable fact", when we can't trust anyone or anything in today's world? Is it 100% verifiable that Hunter Biden did coke at the white house? That Nancy Pelosi and friends aren't just really talented at picking stocks?

Trump has consistently scammed and grifted for decades. There are dozens of verified examples, I don't even think you would deny this?

So let's Occams razor this shit.

1. Trump, known grifter, wasn't aware of folks running this pump and dump scam with his name attached to it, landing hundreds of millions of dollars in his account. Upon finding out, instead of firing those involved and demanding those affected be compensated, he just went on living his life.

2. Trump, known grifter, knew and made hundreds of millions of dollars off of it.

I mean you are the think for yourself and do your own research guy, aren't you?
 
I already made my point, there's no reason to repeat myself. You can just go back and read it if need be. If there was even an ounce of evidence to support this claim you don't think they'd be trying to put him in prison again? They certainly already tried and for A LOT less.

Your claims are baseless and not rooted in reality, evidence, or fact. Saying he's a known grifter (twice actually) doesn't magically turn this into fact. You hate Trump and want it to be true, which I suppose is the nature of the disease.
 
Do you really think there is MORE EVIDENCE of Trump himself manipulating a crypto coin (which he knows nothing about btw) than your 2 awful examples?

Hunter is on fucking video of the night in question at the White House looking like an absolute degenerate drug addict. Kid was twitching the fuck out.

Then, your other one, has like some of the craziest long term history of being verifiably correct (Pelosi market predictions).

I'm not saying I KNOW Trump had nothing to do with it. I'm saying there's no evidence he did. And if there was, they'd certainly be trying to put him in prison.

It's guilty until proven innocent with Trump. Well done boys.
 
Do you really think there is MORE EVIDENCE of Trump himself manipulating a crypto coin (which he knows nothing about btw) than your 2 awful examples?

Hunter is on fucking video of the night in question at the White House looking like an absolute degenerate drug addict. Kid was twitching the fuck out.

Then, your other one, has like some of the craziest long term history of being verifiably correct (Pelosi market predictions).

I'm not saying I KNOW Trump had nothing to do with it. I'm saying there's no evidence he did. And if there was, they'd certainly be trying to put him in prison.

It's guilty until proven innocent with Trump. Well done boys.
Buddy, I thought you already made your point and we moved on from this. This video is about insider trading. Different hustle.

But man. The hoops you are willing to jump through to give Trump the benefit of the doubt, demand proof, and label everyone else as TDS or whatever...

If you held all the stories you read to the same standard of proof and gave Democrats you don't like the same benefit of the doubt, you'd be one hell of a well-rounded person. Ah well.