wal66
New Member
- Since
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 11,716
- Score
- 2
- Tokens
- 0
RJ, I printed it out and framed it.
Wally now that dog will probably die a painful slow death from cancer. Drowning was a much better ending.
But I admire your intentions.
RJ, I printed it out and framed it.
I will call all the books that sent me checks this year and ask them to void all the checks they sent me because I didn't bet the best line. I'm on the phone as we speak.
I bet dozens of games every day in various sports from football to basketball to soccer and tennis and hockey. I cap each game for 1-2 minutes and then bet on it a certain amount of money. I have no time to shop around for lines. When you are hitting at more than 60% getting a -150 instead of a -140 is irrelevant.
pavyracerYou were robbed. It was -110 at many places.
To be honest Pav's I look at it the same way but I am trying to familiarize myself with the various approaches. Math guys are successful for a reason. There are plenty of cappers that are successful and again, for a good reason. I like asking questions of both groups because there is something that can be gained from each. I would never be able to be a strictly numbers guy but learning about certain aspects could help. Hell at this point anything could help.
Seriously, who says math guys are successful? Do they win more than cappers? math guys i see just cap numbers, and that doesn't always win when betting ML's in baseball.
My stance across the forums has been to cap the piss out of a few teams and you will win. If you know the strengths and weaknesses of the Rays, you will pound the books Wal by raising your bets. No need for a lot of modeling BS.
this is some of the worst advice I have ever read.
You think someone should 'cap' without math. There are imo very few people in this world who can do that successfully over the long term, and they almost assuredly also use math.