CaliGirl, I want to formally apologize.

  • Start date
    • •
  • Replies 124 Comments
  • • Views 8,220 Views
MonkeyF0cker
Oksy,

Do you honestly think books ignore the action in their casinos/sportsbooks until people withdraw? If so, is freerolling due to incompetence or negligence any better than freerolling intentionally?
Click to expand...
No they don't, but it's in their best interest to do so to make profits. Isn't that why they are in business?

Matty
Girl giving head has no choice but to be reactive.

We pro(active)s.

:highfive:
Click to expand...

I'm not sure the argument we are having here, but if you agree to give a male head as a female I don't see why it would be a surprise when he gets his nut and blows in your mouth. Again this is a male perspective.
 
European books are certainly aware of what action they are receiving from new accounts right away. Evidence is them cutting limits after as little as one bet on certain items.

Heritage does the same thing. New players are started on a square line set. If they bet the sharp side of those lines (even a few times) they are put on differen't lines. So, Heritage is most certainly aware of the type of action they are taking from new accounts while before any verification's take place.
 
FreeFall
No they don't, but it's in their best interest to do so to make profits. Isn't that why they are in business?
Click to expand...

If they're in business to freeroll players, they shouldn't be in business.
 
I hear the Will Hill books in vegas aren't letting people bet posted numbers.
 
MonkeyF0cker
Oksy,

Do you honestly think books ignore the action in their casinos/sportsbooks until people withdraw? If so, is freerolling due to incompetence or negligence any better than freerolling intentionally?
Click to expand...

as far as monitoring the casino side....how the money is lost/what games in casino are played/viewing strategy-speed of hands played. etc...they most certainly ignore that stuff until its time to deal with a payout...why would anyone think that they would be monitoring losing money??? its simply not worth wasting time and money on...

cory and others are under the assumption that heritage was monitoring the play and knew it was him because of the many deposits and the games played...really, nobody uses its resources to study losing casino play
 
RayRay
as far as monitoring the casino side....how the money is lost/what games in casino are played/viewing strategy-speed of hands played. etc...they most certainly ignore that stuff until its time to deal with a payout...why would anyone think that they would be monitoring losing money??? its simply not worth wasting time and money on...

cory and others are under the assumption that heritage was monitoring the play and knew it was him because of the many deposits and the games played...really, nobody uses its resources to study losing casino play
Click to expand...

Why is he banned then?

How many people do you think give an offshore sportsbook's casino the amount of VP action that Cory does?

Do you think the amount of action that Cory gives a book like Heritage would cause them to look into who is playing when someone was already banned for doing the same thing?
 
It's just absurd to me that people think that they aren't watching the action they take in. Just because they don't present a case for not paying someone until they attempt to withdraw doesn't mean that they aren't watching what's going on. And if they truly aren't watching, then you should really be worried about sending that book money.
 
you would be surprised at how many casino degens there are... the other way to view it is that if, by chance, they had an idea it was him, and he obv. bearded back in because he thinks he has an edge, who is doing the free rolling? cory is..albeit a very moronic assumption on his part... so the book telling him to fuck himself for attempting to free roll them (in his mind) isnt a bad decision imo
 
MonkeyF0cker
It's just absurd to me that people think that they aren't watching the action they take in. Just because they don't present a case for not paying someone until they attempt to withdraw doesn't mean that they aren't watching what's going on. And if they truly aren't watching, then you should really be worried about sending that book money.
Click to expand...

they see the action they are taking in, i believe, but when they see its a constant dump into the casino with no payouts, they lose interest fast...monitoring losing casino play is a hugh waste of resources and thats why you have so many disputes come payout time...early investigation would cut down on disputes, no doubt...but i guess its not looked upon as a necessity :dunno: ...
 
RayRay
monitoring losing casino play is a hugh waste of resources and thats why you have so many disputes come payout time...early investigation would cut down on disputes, no doubt...but i guess its not looked upon as a necessity :dunno: ...
Click to expand...

How would a book not have a program written that does this in a matter of seconds every night?
 
RayRay
you would be surprised at how many casino degens there are... the other way to view it is that if, by chance, they had an idea it was him, and he obv. bearded back in because he thinks he has an edge, who is doing the free rolling? cory is..albeit a very moronic assumption on his part... so the book telling him to fuck himself for attempting to free roll them (in his mind) isnt a bad decision imo
Click to expand...

It's not a freeroll to place a bet against an accepting participant (especially one OFFERING the wager). It's a freeroll when one side has no chance to win the bet.
 
Ray,

Disputes come largely at withdrawal because shitty books have positioned themselves to freeroll players. Plain and simple. Respectable books would cut that player off far before 53 deposits and a subsequent withdrawal.
 
I'm just confused here.

Heritage doesn't want Cory making 53 deposits and playing Jacks or better all day long. But anyone else is free to do so?

Like MF said, they should have software to monitor shit like this. It should be absurdly easy.

The whole point about this not happening at pinny.greek is they don't offer +ev casino games so they don't care if corey signs up his entire family. Why these places are sacred of this moron that can't even figure out how to not get caught gnoming is beyond me.
 
cory wouldnt beard back in unless he truly thought he had a substantial edge...after being banned, getting back into the casino would be considered a free roll to a lot of people...since he thinks he is going to hit and run... i dunno, she fucked their story up from the start, that all the evidence they really needed... accusing j7 of being bought off is flat out dumb since they were going to pay to have someone else look over the situation too...but, no matter what the outcome or how people think its being handled, its just another case of a guy being a dumbass...and dragging his mom into it is awful too
 
rito
I'm just confused here.

Heritage doesn't want Cory making 53 deposits and playing Jacks or better all day long. But anyone else is free to do so?

Like MF said, they should have software to monitor shit like this. It should be absurdly easy.

The whole point about this not happening at pinny.greek is they don't offer +ev casino games so they don't care if corey signs up his entire family. Why these places are sacred of this moron that can't even figure out how to not get caught gnoming is beyond me.
Click to expand...

arent you buddies with ganch? or mf buddies with him? one of you guys should get a hold of him and see if there is anyway to get the complete story on the matter:yes: ...

like i said, if they were monitoring it closely and realized it was him...after he is banned, its their way of teaching him a lesson...and i dont disagree with the decision to return the deposits and making it clear that they wont payout to a banned player...
 
RayRay
cory wouldnt beard back in unless he truly thought he had a substantial edge...
Click to expand...

Why? Why can't he just be a huge degenerate? He probably likes the loss rebates and thinks he may be able to get some extra bonuses out of them.

after being banned, getting back into the casino would be considered a free roll to a lot of people...since he thinks he is going to hit and run...
Click to expand...

How is there any evidence of him attempting to hit and run? At every site, he's been down a considerable amount of money. I'd say that 53 deposits is significantly contrary to this statement.

i dunno, she fucked their story up from the start, that all the evidence they really needed... accusing j7 of being bought off is flat out dumb since they were going to pay to have someone else look over the situation too...but, no matter what the outcome or how people think its being handled, its just another case of a guy being a dumbass...and dragging his mom into it is awful too
Click to expand...

Yeah. He's an idiot. Doesn't mean that both parties aren't at fault.
 
RayRay
arent you buddies with ganch? or mf buddies with him? one of you guys should get a hold of him and see if there is anyway to get the complete story on the matter:yes: ...

like i said, if they were monitoring it closely and realized it was him...after he is banned, its their way of teaching him a lesson...and i dont disagree with the decision to return the deposits and making it clear that they wont payout to a banned player...
Click to expand...

If they knew it was him, do you think they'd admit it? Would you admit it to people right now?

So, you're simply stating that you're in favor of a book freerolling a player. Should I advocate that players chargeback their CC's since I think books are stupid for accepting them? That's essentially what you're endorsing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.