Hooligans Sportsbook

Dennis Rodman says he's "dead ass broke"

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    58 Replies •
  • Views 3,071 Views
Follow
senco78
I do some work for a builder that caught his wife cheating and divorced her. she never worked, stayed at home with kids... he made good money but earned it by working his way up and being a savy business man wheeling and dealing houses, empty lots, farmland, etc..
he is now paying $10K a month to the bitch for 3 kids:surprised:

and her dad is a multimillionaire.... guessing her daddy got her a lawyer that was in "the good ole boy system" with the judge
Click to expand...

What pisses me off she is probably spending $9K a month on herself and her new boyfriend and only $1K on the kids. When alimony is awarded the money should be spend on the kids by the mother not on her!
 
to be expected

I would've been surprised if he wasn't broke. this is the worm and he hasn't gotten an nba paycheck in 12 years

he hung on playing overseas and in semi-pro leagues for a few years until age 45, proving how desperately he needed money

blew through money like allen iverson
 
The problem is the system is fucked. Whenever they calculate child support and alimony for higher net worth individuals, they always lookinto trying to maintain the standard of living that the other spouse and children are accustomed to.

But I don't get how a baby, toddler or even a 5yo has a standard of living. They need to be fed, clothed, educated, have social interaction and most importantly loved. Whether that's going to ballet and riding ponies or playing at the park and having swimming lessons at the YMCA, kids don't know any different. So it's basically the lifestyle that the spouse is accustomed to and as Pavy says, I highly doubt much of that cash goes to the kids. My son and I are living in an almost bare house right now and we're basically echoing as we talk to each other but he doesn't have a clue. If anything, he loves that he has room to run around even more and is having a ball screaming and hearing his voice bouncing off of the walls.

It's all a crock. And unfortunately 99% of the time the guy gets shafted. If it's any consolation, at least you can say you know at least one chick who's getting cameled too and she's not a movie star or athlete who at least made millions a year at one point. Be careful who you bone people. Cagey ratfucks out there.
 
Oksana
The problem is the system is fucked. Whenever they calculate child support and alimony for higher net worth individuals, they always lookinto trying to maintain the standard of living that the other spouse and children are accustomed to.

But I don't get how a baby, toddler or even a 5yo has a standard of living. They need to be fed, clothed, educated, have social interaction and most importantly loved. Whether that's going to ballet and riding ponies or playing at the park and having swimming lessons at the YMCA, kids don't know any different. So it's basically the lifestyle that the spouse is accustomed to and as Pavy says, I highly doubt much of that cash goes to the kids. My son and I are living in an almost bare house right now and we're basically echoing as we talk to each other but he doesn't have a clue. If anything, he loves that he has room to run around even more and is having a ball screaming and hearing his voice bouncing off of the walls.

It's all a crock. And unfortunately 99% of the time the guy gets shafted. If it's any consolation, at least you can say you know at least one chick who's getting cameled too and she's not a movie star or athlete who at least made millions a year at one point. Be careful who you bone people. Cagey ratfucks out there.
Click to expand...

How about people stay married or don't have fukkin kids...

These fukkin broads act like they were raped to have these children...

Can't fukkin stand it anymore, fukkin clowns everywhere I look...:facepalm:
 
iifold
How about people stay married or don't have fukkin kids...

These fukkin broads act like they were raped to have these children...

Can't fukkin stand it anymore, fukkin clowns everywhere I look...:facepalm:
Click to expand...

Well for sure that's ideal but look at someone in my case... I waited until I was 34 and kind of set with stuff and I knew I was emotionally and financially ready to have children. But I didn't want to just marry someone for the sake of it. That wouldn't do me any good and I've heard too many horror stories of my friends growing up in families where the parents "stayed together for the children" and it's wacked. As are their relationships now a bit.

I can't blame anyone for not staying together. You never get together with someone thinking you'll break up some day. Shit happens. But the system can be a bit more realistic. If I come in with nothing, then as long as my child is taken care of, that's what I should leave with. And I should be made to work once they're in kindergarten. None of this pay a chick a crazy amount each month because she happened to be with you whilst you were flying high in the NBA making millions a year. Especially when it's 10 years after the fact.
 
I also despise the current system of child support

it makes no damn sense and I don't understand why it was created in the first place or why it was never fixed

you have sex with someone and they have a baby means they get thousands a month even if you don't have the money you made anymore? if child support is to exist, it should be at a basic rate of paying for necessities for the child and it also shouldn't have to do with how much the father earned in the past. no necessities for a child cost $5,000 a month
 
Enigma
I also despise the current system of child support

it makes no damn sense and I don't understand why it was created in the first place or why it was never fixed

you have sex with someone and they have a baby means they get thousands a month even if you don't have the money you made anymore? if child support is to exist, it should be at a basic rate of paying for necessities for the child and it also shouldn't have to do with how much the father earned in the past. no necessities for a child cost $5,000 a month
Click to expand...

It should always be scaled to what the secondary carer parent is earning. I'm not sure why US courts don't enforce that those arrangements are amended after substantial salary adjustments occur. I never used to pay attention to this stuff but obviously I do now and I keep seeing these people - who are basically unemployable no names now - being sued for all of this back child support. How do you pay that with little to no income?

I'm sure I could spend 10k a month on my son for maybe 3 mths in a row. After that, it'd be a struggle. The kid is 2. He likes playing with empty boxes and dried pasta. If someone were giving me 20k or even 5k a month for him, it'd be a waste unless I just banked it or blew it on myself. Maybe a decent payment when your pregnant to get the nursery set up, medical bills, pay for a nanny if you need it, whatever. But wtf do you spend that much monthly money on? As long as your child's shelter, food, clothing and hopefully a few activities are taken care of - paid by both parents - I'm not sure how people justify this in court with a straight face.
 
Oksana
It should always be scaled to what the secondary carer parent is earning. I'm not sure why US courts don't enforce that those arrangements are amended after substantial salary adjustments occur. I never used to pay attention to this stuff but obviously I do now and I keep seeing these people - who are basically unemployable no names now - being sued for all of this back child support. How do you pay that with little to no income?

I'm sure I could spend 10k a month on my son for maybe 3 mths in a row. After that, it'd be a struggle. The kid is 2. He likes playing with empty boxes and dried pasta. If someone were giving me 20k or even 5k a month for him, it'd be a waste unless I just banked it or blew it on myself. Maybe a decent payment when your pregnant to get the nursery set up, medical bills, pay for a nanny if you need it, whatever. But wtf do you spend that much monthly money on? As long as your child's shelter, food, clothing and hopefully a few activities are taken care of - paid by both parents - I'm not sure how people justify this in court with a straight face.
Click to expand...

how would you legitimately use 10k a month for your child even for a few months? aside from banking it as a college fund (doesn't count) or buying him diamond-encrusted pacifiers and hiring people to do everything for you, I don't understand how one would legitimately do that as a real necessity. also excluded of course is sending your child to some club where they charge hundreds an hour to amuse him or her

what these women do is blow the money on themselves
 
Enigma
how would you legitimately use 10k a month for your child even for a few months? aside from banking it as a college fund (doesn't count) or buying him diamond-encrusted pacifiers and hiring people to do everything for you, I don't understand how one would legitimately do that as a real necessity. also excluded of course is sending your child to some club where they charge hundreds an hour to amuse him or her

what these women do is blow the money on themselves
Click to expand...

Oh I could find a way for a month or two. I'd feel silly but it could be done. Like I said, I'd last about 3 mths max. Buy him ridiculous designer clothes that he'd grow out of in 2 mths/ruin in 2 days, spend money on getting a Sheng Fui person to sort out his room, baby massage, get him a customised baby Bentley?, elaborate catering for his play dates ie crazy amounts of Champagne and chocolate and whatever else I could blow cash on I guess.

Just thinking about all of that is ridiculous. The only thing I believe in spending a decent amount on is medical obviously and education. If a child is in a school with fees when the parents separated - and one parent can contribute more to those fees than the other - then I believe those fees should be paid, based on a % of what you both can afford. If one parent doesn't have an income since they've always been the primary care giver, then the other one should suck it up and pay. Kids shouldn't have to move schools because their parents split up unless absolutely necessary. That's the only thing I'd be a stickler about. Not that I think kids moving schools is necessarily a bad thing but having them go through that at the same time as dealing with their parents' splitting up would be lovely to avoid.

Everything else is just a wank/con job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.