betplom
Everythings computer!
- Since
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 29,088
- Score
- 1,637
- Tokens
- 0
:thumbsup:that's another one on the nuru massage list
Massage List
choo
MonkeyF0cker
rayray
:thumbsup:that's another one on the nuru massage list
Massage List
choo
MonkeyF0cker
rayray
Smart money bets Georgia to win the BCS next year with that joke of a schedule.
Won't happen FW. Sure this year you had a non-conference champion play for the title but it will be highly unlikely to see it again UNLESS you had 2 teams the caliber of this years LSU and Alabama teams. Georgia won't be in that league of talent or performance.
People can bitch about SEC bias or how can a non-conference champion be playing for the title and maybe on some scale they can make a valid argument but in this particular title game the BCS got it right. Not because I'm an SEC fan, not because I have rose colored glasses ( I didn't think Florida should have played for the title in a re-match against FSU) because of just how good those 2 teams are.
When Ohio St was getting into the National Title game and laying an egg against SEC opponents was it so much better because there was a broader representation?
I hate the way the BCS is set up but still think the best 2 teams played for the title. Maybe Oklahoma St would have scored, maybe Oregon, Maybe Stanford wouldn't have totally embarrassed and maybe Oregon would have kept it closer than 13 (with some garbage score when the game was essentially over) this time around.
What do you want to hear FW? I would give you Andrew Luck with Oregon's offensive players and USC's defense throw in Wisconsin and Oklahoma as bench players and still Take Bama THIS year.
Maybe they would and maybe they wouldn't. The thing is we KNOW Bama couldn't score a TD. Each year is independant of previous years. How bout we cancel the CBB season and have UNC-Ohio St play the best of 35 since its obvious they are the best two teams. Sounds pretty dumb, doesn't it. Now show me where the regular season mattered when it came to Bama?
Uhh. They lost one game to the number one team in the country by 3 points. What on Earth are you talking about?
Who else deserves to be there? A team that got blown out by that very same team earlier in the year (Oregon), the team that lost BADLY to the team that got blown out by that very same team earlier in the year (Stanford), the team that lost outright to a team with a 3-6 conference record as 28(?) point favorites (Oklahoma St.), or the team that played a bunch of nobodies and lost at home to TCU (Boise St.)?
What exactly is your gripe? How is it a joke?![]()
Ore was missing the one of their best players also. If you cant even play for your league title, how can you play for the national title with a shit schedule?
Bama didn't have near the quality wins Ok St had either. Simple logic actually.
Or those of use who don't pay for cable TV and watched the game via livestream.
Yes. Alabama definitely would have lost a game to a team like Iowa St.
Gee. A team that has one 3-point loss against the number one team in the country or a team that has a loss against one of the worst teams in the country?
Exactly. Simple logic.