Saulty
EV ZEIN
- Since
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 12,079
- Score
- 17
- Tokens
- 0
I made a long term winning play, yours sucked.
I suggest you take MF up on his offer.
I suggest you suck your donkey's cock.
I made a long term winning play, yours sucked.
I suggest you take MF up on his offer.
I made a long term winning play, yours sucked.
I suggest you take MF up on his offer.
I know what you mean by long term based on the price you got if it lost is less so it keeps you in the game longer BUT, you both won. They both paid the same regardless if yours was at -115 and Pavy's was at -150. You both got back the same on your money. It only makes a difference had you lost.
This is what I said 4 pages ago, math guys calculate losing into the equation and cappers don't want to think about losing. That is not a slam on math guys, it's not an argument that cappers are better than math guys it's just the perception that each have to approach their craft at.
It doesn't matter for me either way cause I do nothing but pick losers so my capping doesn't work and learning the math will be of little use either cause I'll be bust before it turns around.
If I bet $100 on a -150, how much money do I win? How about $100 on a -115?
Pavy has explained he bets to win MonkeyFocker so he would bet 150 to win 100. I understand what you are saying but it doesn't apply if you are bettering to win.
How? I explain to you what the guy said he does and that is running in circles? I tell you I understand what you are saying but it doesn't apply if you are betting to win not risking and that is running in circles? Focker as asked -115 wins more, but betting to win they both pay egaually. How is that running in circles?
Why does it matter to you at what price I won my bet? This is not a dick measuring contest. I risked $400 on my square play and you risked $6000 on your sharp play. But guess what if the play lost you would have been in the red for 6K whereas me would have been in the red for 400.