Matty...

[Archie]

Matt Forte, Vincent Jackson, and Greg Olsen for Wes Welker, Jimmy Graham, and injured Addai?

 

[Matty]

Send the trade proposal and I'll see/counteroffer if need be.

:bringit:

 

[Archie]

not sure I did it right or not

 

[Matty]

I got nothing.

 

[Archie]

Forte for Welker 1:1 was actually a bad trade going forward for me. Wanted to see what your reaction would be...

 

[Matty]

No it wasn't.

You should've accepted Romo/Addai for Jackson/what's-his-face, it was slightly more beneficial to you. Romo is huge in this league.

 

[Archie]

going forward Forte has alot more value than Welker....


he's on a pace that is unsustainable and I think you over valued

second of all

Welker is on a bye when we have our matchup.... so he wouldn't even have been able to come back to bite you... (bonus value)

 

[Matty]

I have no idea what you're talking about. It's all about them projected points.

I don't know shit about football.

 

[roguejuror]

Aaron Hernandez for Forte

 

[Archie]

I have no idea what you're talking about. It's all about them projected points.

I don't know shit about football.

yeah and that is even more why i'm puzzled

yahoo projects Forte with about 316 points this season and Welker for 282


now i'm not great with math, but so far Forte has accumulated 108 and Welker has accumulated 133


that means those all important point thingys... Forte is gonna get 208 more of them (with one extra game) and Welker is gonna get 149 if they held to their projections...


RB's>>>WR


I don't need a Qb thanks though

 

[Archie]

Aaron Hernandez for Forte

only way i'd trade one of my Stud RB's was for a top 3 receiver

 

[Matty]

yeah and that is even more why i'm puzzled

yahoo projects Forte with about 316 points this season and Welker for 282


now i'm not great with math, but so far Forte has accumulated 108 and Welker has accumulated 133


that means those all important point thingys... Forte is gonna get 208 more of them (with one extra game) and Welker is gonna get 149 if they held to their projections...


RB's>>>WR


I don't need a Qb thanks though

It's also about who you can use weekly. If a guy is good but not as good as the rest of your guys at the same position, logically he's not going to play very often so his actual value is very limited.

Romo improves your team dramatically at the QB position. But whatever, I like where I'm at right now.

 

[Archie]

and this with yahoo projecting oft injured Welker getting very near to Jerry Rice, Marvin Harrison, and Randy Moss record breaking territories.. near 1800+ yards, 135 ish receptions 13 td's


good luck, maybe he'll DO BETTER than those numbers and outscore Forte going forward

 

[Matty]

One can hope. I'm gonna be RICH!

 

[Archie]

It's also about who you can use weekly. If a guy is good but not as good as the rest of your guys at the same position, logically he's not going to play very often so his actual value is very limited.

Romo improves your team dramatically at the QB position. But whatever, I like where I'm at right now.

Dramatically?

not sure about that...

for the rest of the year here are the point projections for the full year.

Romo-448
Manning-379
Schaub-391

so I might get a +3.5 point benefit from Romo per game theoretically... which is not enough....

especially since, I can pick the best matchup out of my two 2nd tier qb's and will often do better point wise that way anyways...

its also a bit less than the amount per game that Forte will outgain Welker by...

but I balance that with the fact that ROMO always gets hurt.

trading for ROMO makes no upgrade sense by points, or for my personal NFL prognosticating...

 

[Matty]

Ima gladly keep Romo off the market and on my bench.

 

[Archie]

Ima gladly keep Romo off the market and on my bench.

good point

i'll keep my 3 top RB'S from the league and try to make the playoffs

 

[roguejuror]

fine