FairWarning
Legal Drug Mule
- Since
- Apr 9, 2010
- Messages
- 11,934
- Score
- 840
- Tokens
- 18
Why do you need 2 units plays? You change the rules at every turn, not surprising.
I can't believe I am doing this but I do agree with Daft on one thing. There needs to be a minimum number of total plays for the season.
Guys think out every possible loophole the other could use in advance and iron everything out. I like Foldie but I don't know him from Adam and while he may be a very integrable guy he could just as easily be a Brock Landers ghost for all I know. My backing of him will stand and if anything shady (I don't think there will be just making sure Daft is covered) goes down I will honor my end of paying off the challenge.
I'm in if:
-It's decided by units (max unit play is 5). Whoever has the most units (-8.25 units > -22.75 units for example) is the winner.
-If someone is already barreled in and it's the end of April and they stop making selections they lose the contest.
-If you don't make a selection for 7 days you lose the contest
- both contestants post up $200 with any one of Juror/durito/Matty by April 4th
- winner collects the $200 from the person they posted up with (whether this be in person or PayPal etc).
- we use 5dimes or pinny odds that are viewable on sbrodds
- minimum 200 plays to win the contest
We need a mediator. I miss Polaroid.
You change the rules at every turn, not surprising.
Not a terrible idea to have variable unit plays anyway.
I personally HATE the -unit disqualification thing (personally could see a bad run followed by a small up swing followed by a bad run with never knowing if a REALLY hot streak was on the horizon) but if you guys agree to it then cool beans.
Daft make this happen... This will be more than amusing.
I'm in for whatever rules you want, just want it to be 5dimes lines.