Archie
SP Nation and I Ruin things
- Since
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 24,451
- Score
- 2,385
- Tokens
- 50
The skill of mixing pitches should in most cases be reflected in a pitcher's long term metrics such as FIP/xFIP. I'm not going to calculate it exactly, but I'm looking at Jamie Moyer's 2006-2010 stats and his ERA seems pretty much in line with his actual FIP/xFIP. Some years his ERA is higher than it should be, some years it's less but it appears to be a pretty much accurate long term measure.
The case of intangibles is definitely true in MLB but it is the exception rather than the rule. Jamie Moyer doesn't exhibit anything other than the metrics he produces although someone like Matt Cain consistently posts a very low HR/FB ratio - but that could very well be because of pitching coaches in SF rather than any inherent ability (and there is a lot of material about Cain's HR/FB ratio if you're interested).
MLB is not like the other sports when it comes to player development and the draft is a real crapshoot (although a good scouting team can assist in it). They draft from HS and from colleges, someone posting awesome numbers from HS is not necessarily MLB material. Scouts looking at HS players are going to use their eyes to look for future potential rather than any numbers when drafting. When players are nowhere being fully developed, you can't really rely upon numbers.
again
I"m actually still half awake. I'll re-digest this tomorrow
I really do appreciate you answering my random drunken incoherent replies, point by point. and i'll appreciate it even more tomorrow.
as far as the crapshoot with scouts and drafting college vs HS. that is a very interesting conversation.
but you also have to factor in the South American baseball camps/colleges ect whatever you wanna call them, that MLB teams are pooring millions into
more and more. the impact arm or bat you are gonna have on your team is gonna come from some tiny village in S. America and NOT from Arizona, Rice, Cal or some florida or california HS prep.
its a crapshoot
but some teams are better at all facets of it than other teams
and what determines that? metrics? stats?
no an old fashioned eye for baseball and an intangible gift for predicting future MLB talent.
I mean the KC royals knew what they were doing right? or was it all just luck?
I'm not sure to be honest either. Baseball is such a weird sport to "scout" evaluate "talent" ect....