Hooligans Sportsbook

Let's Talk Mattress'

  • Start date
  • Replies
    34 Replies •
  • Views 1,245 Views

CASPERWAIT$

Drama Moobs Your Mom
Since
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
14,810
Score
3,706
Tokens
0
So I spent last week shopping for a new mattress'

I went with a super plush because I never understood the reason for a firm.

I think the support on a super plush is still good.

I know what I paid and was curious if I under/over spent for something I will sleep alone on 84% of the time.

What did you guys spend on your mattress'
 
Well, I think it's apples to oranges but I paid close to 3k.for a generic Tempurpedic type about 4 years ago. I had some back issues though and wanted a good mattress that would last for years. I know people who have paid $300 and people who have paid $4000. Seemed like a lot of money at the time, but if you average it out over 20 years expected life expectancy, it's a good investment.

Unless you have back issues and a lot of extra money, I wouldn't think you would need something over $1000 though...but really that's just a number I threw out there.

If I was younger and doing a lot of moving around, I think I would buy more "disposable" type mattresses that I wouldn't have to lug around with me.
 
Just had a new Sealy queen firm mattress and box spring delivered from Macy's on Thursday. $500 in all with taxes and s&h
Damn. That's good. I bought a Sealy when I was married and think we paid about a dime for it. I think mattresses have gotten less expensive over the years overall.

There are so many types ...and many new options..memory foam etc. I say get along with the least expensive you are comfortable on but be aware that the cheaper ones may last not as long...I don't think I would want a mattress for 20 years anyway...although I suspect there are some in this (mom's) house that are close to/older than that. Of course those are downstairs in the guest bedrooms lol
 
Folks had one growing up. Sex an interesting experience on it. they always had problems with holes, etc., the thing seemed pretty high maintenance. Now I'm thinking you're still leopard skin theme but one of those old school vibrating beds, extra strength.
 
OOO but first memory foam mattress (no gel coolant) has been the BEST to date so will probably go with that again! Even though Boner said CR stated gel coolant in memory foam was a scam, the one thing bout the mattress is in the summer it does seem a "little warm" so we figure get the gel next time!

I know I mentioned this before but never go to Consumer Reports anymore cause they stated years ago the particular V-Tech cordless we bought was the best and really was the worst! Maybe CR makes more money off advertising than people buying their report? I'm cynical, I know!
 
CR doesn't have any advertising.

Im sure they didnt say the phone you bought was flawless and they certainly didn't guarantee the individual unit you bought... joking aside, CR is all about the long haul as is "scientific" testing. For you to quit trusting CR b/c of one anecdotal experience flys in the face of the very enlightenment they are peddling! Come back to the objective side of consumerism MrM!
 
Technically I guess they do have banner ads but do you really think this blind content is influencing their recommendations?


Consumer Reports*is well known for its policies on*editorial independence, which it says are to "maintain our independence and impartiality... [so that] CU has no agenda other than the interests of consumers."[3][4]*CR has unusually strict requirements and sometimes has taken extraordinary steps; for example it declined to renew a car dealership's bulk subscription because of "the appearance of an impropriety".[5]

Consumer Reports does not allow outside advertising in the magazine[3][4]*but its website has retailers' advertisements. Consumer Reports states that*PriceGrabber*places the ads and pays a percentage of referral fees to CR,[6]*who has no direct relationship with the retailers.[7]*Consumer Reports publishes reviews of its business partner and recommends it in at least one case.[8]*CR had a similar relationship withBizRate*at one time[9]*and has had relationships with other companies including*Amazon.com,[10]*Yahoo!,[11]*The Wall Street Journal;*The Washington Post;[12]*BillShrink;[13]*and Decide.com.[14]*CR also accepts grants from other organizations,[15]*and at least one high-ranking*Consumer Reports*employee has gone on to work for a company he evaluated.[16]

CR also forbids the use of its reviews for selling products; for example, it won't allow a manufacturer to advertise a positive review.[3]*CR has gone to court to enforce that rule.[17]

Consumer Reports*says its staff purchases all tested products at retail prices, anonymously in "most cases",[6]*and that they accept no free samples in order to prevent bias from bribery or from being given better than average samples.[3]*However, in order to review some products before they are publicly available CR does accept "press samples" from manufacturers but says pays for the samples and does not include them in ratings.[6]*For most of CR's history it minimized contact with government and industry experts "to avoid compromising the independence of its judgment." In 2007, in response to errors in infant car seat testing, it began accepting advice from a wide range of experts on designing tests, but not on final assessments.[18]*Also, at times CR allows manufacturers to review and respond to criticism before publication.[4]

Some objective and comparative tests published byConsumer Reports*are carried out under the umbrella of the international consumer organization*International Consumer Research & Testing.*Consumer Reports*also uses outside labs for testing, including for 11 percent of tests in 2006.[18]