Let's Talk Pucks

[wal66]

Well I don't have enough here for Reno and HighStick'n Plays (not giving up on you Reno) but I do have a couple plays that qualify for tonight. I have nothing in college hoops so let's talk about these hockey plays and see if anything aligns with some of the hockey guru's.

Montreal +140: Montreal holds a 6-4 head to head advantage against Pittsburgh in their last 10 games. The road team is also 6-4 SU in those same last 10 games.

Washington -1.5 (+240): Washington holds a 8-2 SU record in the last 10 head to head meetings with Carolina. Washington also has a decided edge in PUCK LINE games in their previous 10 games overall. I would feel safer playing a PUCK LINE with a home team but the edge leans towards Washington here.

Montreal/Pittsburgh UNDER (-145): I've said I don't like TOTALS with this high of a price because it's too easy to find better values but with a limited card tonight an edge (even at a higher price) is still an edge.


Nothing above is a play just potential plays/plays if supported by the guys that know.

 

[Matty]

I hope you don't mind us tweeting your Montreal play. And calling you our NHL guru.

 

[wal66]

You would probably do your clients a better service to offer the UNDER as your FREE PLAY for the day.

Sadly, I am not guru material, I have neither the history nor demeanor to carry such a lofty title.

 

[wal66]

I would offer my services as a crisis councselor though to help those who are battling their gambling addiction. You know the whole responsible/ethical thing like the casinos who tell you to know when you have a problem.

 

[Matty]

I could actually use your services to write a medium-sized piece on sports betting basics. 500-1000 words discussing the concept and your overall approach.

 

[wal66]

I could actually use your services to write a medium-sized piece on sports betting basics. 500-1000 words discussing the concept and your overall approach.

 

[Matty]

Dead serious.

 

[stevek173]

Loving that Washington play might tail gl Wally

 

[wal66]

Dead serious.

I like the challenge. Now if I can just figure out how to expand "Heads or Tails" into 500 to 1000 words.

 

[Matty]

Now if I can just figure out how to expand "Heads or Tails" into 500 to 1000 words.

That is, in essence, the challenge. We have faith in you.

 

[wal66]

I accept. Will work on it later.

 

[roguejuror]

Dead serious.

We are going for authenticity. :

 

[kato]

I hope you don't mind us tweeting your Montreal play. And calling you our NHL guru.

:+1:

 

[wal66]

I would like to take this opportunity to remind the hockey guys that by staying in the shadows when you are called upon for your experience is a clear indicator that your sub-set will never get any recognition.

 

[FairWarning]

I hope you don't mind us tweeting your Montreal play. And calling you our NHL guru.

Enigma won't be happy.

 

[Matty]

Wal who the fok are you calling a sub-set

:bringit:

 

[betplom]

Enigma won't be happy.

I though being unhappy is what nigma enjoys most.

Other than SBR points, of course.

 

[reno cool]

I have the over in the Pittsburgh game, Wally our methods maybe polar opposites.