Just curious what your issue with Snopes is? Pretty widely respected as one of the best and most reliable fact-checking sites out there. Always clearly provides sources behind all claims. What's the big lol I'm missing?
Because you should be consistent. I agree that legacy media is trash, and am against ALL instances of false and misleading news, regardless of subject or party lines.
"It's okay that we do it because they do it too" mentality is part of what got us into this mess. Same shit with...
FWIW I don't have a problem with Trump being nominated or monks supporting it.
Have a problem with bullshit/misleading reporting, such as 70k nominated (they didn't nominate AND no proof they all supported, just one dudes quote. I'm sure plenty did, but doubt all 70k) and vows of silence were...
You're right, fucking snopes :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Let's look at some more reputable news sources instead. Can you share any sources that 70,000 monks broke their vow of silence, or that they had anything to do with the nomination process besides supporting it after the fact?
Thanks in advance!
Yeah, "them", lol. What a powerful moment when all 70k of them broke their vow of silence with one triumphant shout to cast their nomination!!
Facts:
- Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet made the nomination on Aug 7.
- Yon Seng Yeath (chief monk) declares 70k monks support the nomination three...
Sadly there's no chance Dexter is on there.
If we are talking highest highs, sure. Seasons 1 2 and 4 were some incredible television. But 5-8 😬.
Have been seeing clips of the new one out now though and may dive back in haha
With you on missionary and doggy being 1-2, disagree with hating a girl riding you. I mean you aren't wrong about not doing anything, but that's the point, not the problem 😂
Ohhhh, biological age, that makes sense. Was gonna hard disagree on appearance, lots of Ozempic abusers struggling out there in that regard 😬.
But yeah it really is an amazing drug when used correctly 👏👏👏